User talk:Ellywa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This talk page is archived regularly. Archive links: pre 2004 2004 2005 2006 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Note about my deletions[edit]

If you think I made a wrong decision about deletion of a file, please think about your motivation and ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. Another admin will decide on the matter. It is appreciated if you ping me, so I can get new insights. Thanks Ellywa (talk) 15:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File:Anthonij bonebakker-1584142931.jpg[edit]

File:Anthonij bonebakker-1584142931.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Amsterdamszilver (talk) 14:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Renaat peeters-1677160349.jpg[edit]

Hallo Ellywa, is dit misschien Renaat Peeters. Indien ja, kan deze foto aan het lemma en wikidata worden toegevoegd thanks. Lotje (talk) 16:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dat dacht ik eerst ook bij het uploaden, maar dat is verwijderd, het is kennelijk een jongere naamgenoot. Ellywa (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mass renaming of files[edit]

Hi Ellywa,

I hope you are doing well.

I have a few questions for you. The team who is working on a microgrant project made mistake with naming photos from the category Projekat Spomenici Eparhije raško-prizrenske u digitalnom prostoru, the names of the files are not descriptive enough, and can't be searched easily, and therefore they should be changed. Is it possible to raname all of those files at once? If the first solution is not possible, is there a way for those files to be deleted, so they can be uploaded again with appropriate names?

Thank you for your attention regarding this matter. Best, Nevena Rudinac (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Nevena Rudinac, thank. I have never tried it, but there seems to be a method, please look at header "mass rename" on Commons:File_renaming#Mass_rename. Perhaps you will better answered on the Commons:Village pump. To be found, an extensive file description and structured data are perhaps more efficient. This file for instance is showing nothing more then the name of the church. That should be described in more detail. File:PRIZREN 1 668A8953-6.jpg. All the best and success. Ellywa (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you kindly. Best, Nevena Rudinac (talk) 12:20, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of Denis-Benjamin Papineau pic[edit]

Hi, not contesting your deletion of the picture of Denis-Benjamin Papineau (File:Denis-Benjamin Papineau.jpg), but I was wondering - could you give me information on where the original drawing was located? (federal archives Ottawa, or Quebec archives, perhaps?) I may be travelling in that direction and could look into taking a picture of the original, (which is surely out of copyright by now), and then I could post my pic and transfer copyright to Wikimedia? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Mr Serjeant Buzfuz, below the information from the file page. The problem with the image is that the image is a drawing made by Lucien Martial, which is still in copyright. Please read the deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Denis-Benjamin Papineau.jpg. If you find the original photo or painting, which would date from before 1854, that can be uploaded to Commons. Uploading the drawing by Martial is not useful, as this will be deleted again. Kind regards, Ellywa (talk) 23:21, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you. I understand that Martial's drawing is still in copyright, but I'm curious what source he used. Papineau had been dead for 77 years by that point, so Martial couldn't have made the drawing from life in 1931. I will poke around at BaNq and see if I can find the source that Martial had used. 71.17.186.145 00:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, that would be a success! Ellywa (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Description Denis-Benjamin Papineau (1789-1854). Reproduction made circa 1950 of a drawing made in 1931 by Lucien Martial.
Date
Source
Logo BAnQ
This image is available from Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec under the reference number 3263370

This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing.
Boarisch | বাংলা | čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | فارسی | suomi | français | हिन्दी | magyar | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | ไทย | Tiếng Việt | +/− 		Flag of Quebec
image
Author Lucien Martial (1892-1987)

Open data Tweede Kamer[edit]

Dag Elly,
Het heeft allemaal even geduurd, maar ik heb - zoals begin dit jaar besproken - dit sjabloon met toelichting voor open data van de Tweede Kamer gemaakt. Dit leidt tot een drieledig verzoek.

  1. Wil je er jouw kritisch oog over laten gaan en eventuele verbeteringen aanbrengen?
  2. Kun je als lid van het VRT-team het sjabloon voorzien van een verwijzing naar het toepasselijke ticket (nr. Ticket:2023020910008527)?
  3. Zou je deze bestanden weer kunnen terugplaatsen? Ik zal ze dan aflopen en er ofwel dit nieuwe sjabloon ofwel een verwijzing naar de KB op plaatsen (afhankelijke van de datering; de stukken tot 1995 staan niet op tweedekamer.nl, maar zijn door de KB onder CC0 online gezet.

MarcoSwart (talk) 16:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dag Marco, gezien de reikwijdte lijkt het mij beter dit openlijk te bespreken. Dus ik zou voorstellen jouw vraag en het antwoord erop te publiceren en de vertaling naar het sjabloon te bespreken in de copyright sectie van de Village pump en na positieve conclusie een undeletion request in te dienen. Groet, Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Suggestie uitgevoerd. MarcoSwart (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hoi MarcoSwart,

Ik kijk even mee als derde paar ogen. Wat betreft je sjabloon:

  1. De indruk wordt gewerkt drie zaken door elkaar. Artikel 11 van de auteurswet, de reguliere website en het dataportaal. De scope van het sjabloon is nu niet duidelijk. De scope verduidelijken is de eerste stap, daarna kan ik verder met je meekijken.
  2. Daarvoor zijn VRT-tickets niet bedoeld.
  3. Deze bestanden zijn out of scope.

Met vriendelijke groet, Natuur12 (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1. Ik heb de suggestie van Elly gevolgd. Misschien is het een idee eerst mijn vraag en antwoord met de Tweede Kamer te lezen, omdat ik vermoed dat dat je eerste vraag beantwoord.
2. Mij is uitdrukkelijk aangeraden om VRT te gebruiken. Ik veronderstelde dat er dan ook iets met het ticketnummer moet gebeuren.
3. De verwijderreden was zuiver auteursrechtelijk. Ik ben in deze discussie beland omdat er als gevolg van deze verwijdering een bestand uit een WikiWoordenboeklemma werd verwijderd. Of een bestand niet zinvol in Wikimediaprojecten kan worden gebruikt lijkt me iets om eventueel per bestand te bespreken. MarcoSwart (talk) 15:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Sara Ledebour - Meibloemen.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Sara Ledebour - Meibloemen.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sara Ledebour - Meibloemen.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ellywa&oldid=826118498"